SOURCE: The St. Petersburg Times DATE: Issue #1673 (35), Wednesday, September 7, 2011 ************************************************************************** TITLE: Police Allegedly Involved in Attack at Gay Bar AUTHOR: By Sergey Chernov PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: Visitors to a gay club in the center of St. Petersburg were allegedly attacked by plainclothes policemen at the weekend. Three of the victims have reported the incident to the police, while a fourth is in the process of doing so, according to one of the victims. Three men entered the Golubaya Ustritsa club, located at 1 Ulitsa Lomonosova, in the early hours of Sunday morning, reportedly presenting police ID to the club’s security, and proceeded to attack visitors to the club who were dancing on the dancefloor and standing near the bar. The club’s management later passed surveillance camera videos and photographs to the media. “It looked as though it’s simply a form of leisure for these three people who came to the club —fighting with whomever they can,” one of the victims, Ignat Fialkovsky, said to The St. Petersburg Times on Tuesday. “But because nobody in the club wanted to fight them, they’d attack one person after another, hoping that somebody would fight back.” He added that five people were beaten up in the process. The most aggressive attacker shouted “VDV,” Fialkovsky said. The acronym VDV stands for the Russian Airborne Troops, who have a reputation for being particularly macho. Fialkovsky said, however, that the attackers did not shout any homophobic insults. “My impression is that it was not a homophobic attack, but rather simply violent behavior by drunk policemen who think they can get away with anything,” he said. The video from the dance floor shows a crowd of people dancing, then hurrying to the corners or out of the room as the attackers start beating people. According to Fialkovsky, the attackers were part of a larger group of 10 or 11 men, but the other members of the group went to two bars next door. Fialkovsky said that the local media had exaggerated the injuries sustained, reporting hospitalized victims. “Luckily, the incident passed without serious injuries; no ambulance was called, nor was anybody hospitalized,” he said. He said that four or five people had been beaten, while five more received passing blows to the face. “Counting them, there were 10 victims,” Fialkovsky said. The club’s management called the police as soon as the men attacked the clubbers, but no police officers arrived at the scene. The attackers seemingly had no fear of the police. After the attack they did not leave, but stood outside the club smoking. The video from outside the club shows the men attacking another man in the street after leaving the club, punching and kicking him and then holding up their fists after the man managed to sneak inside the club and its security apparently locked the door. Fialkovsky added that the police had identified the attackers and unofficially confirmed they were police officers. “The investigators told me they know these people,” he said. “I saw these people myself yesterday — near police precinct no. 28.” The police said Tuesday that a preliminary inquiry into the incident was underway, while a criminal case is being considered. TITLE: Professors Go On Trial for Espionage AUTHOR: By Galina Stolyarova PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: The St. Petersburg City Court is due to start hearing what is going to become one of the most resonant treason and espionage cases in the city since the 1996-1999 saga of the environmentalist Alexander Nikitin, a researcher for the Norwegian ecological organization Bellona who was accused of passing classified information to Norway’s secret service. Yevgeny Afanasiev and Svyatoslav Bobyshev are professors at the city’s State Military Mechanical University who both spent several months in China in 2009, lecturing at the Polytechnical University in Harbin. Prosecutors now allege that in April and May 2009, both professors passed classified information and revealed state secrets to the Chinese secret service. The General Prosecutor’s Office approved the charges on Sept. 2, and officially forwarded the case to court. The trial will be closed to the public. The date of the first hearing has not yet been announced. Both professors deny their involvement in any criminal activity. They maintain they were only giving lectures at a university in Harbin, and stress that all aspects of the teaching process, including the contents of their lectures, had been approved and kept under control by the administration of the Military Mechanical University. The scientists, who were arrested in March this year, are charged with treason in the form of espionage (Article 275 of the Russian Criminal Code). The charges carry lengthy jail terms, and Afanasiev and Bobyshev have been kept in custody since their arrest. The eminent human rights lawyer Yury Schmidt, who also represented jailed oligarch Mikhail Khodorkovsky, said that if convicted, the scientists will face between 12 and 20 years in jail. “During the past decade, similar charges have been brought with success against a number of scholars and researchers across Russia,” Schmidt said. “There is a tendency to make the punishment tougher: Those sentenced now are receiving more substantial prison terms compared to similar cases 10 years ago.” The most recent espionage scandal involving a Russian scientist occurred in 2007, when Moscow academic Igor Reshetin, general director of the Central Machinery Construction Research Institution, was sentenced to 11-and-a-half years in a penal colony for passing technology to China. Reshetin admitted sharing the technology with his Chinese counterparts, but argued that the materials were not classified, but on the contrary were allowed to be exported and discussed with foreign partners. In 2003, Krasnoyarsk physicist Valentin Danilov was sentenced to 13 years in a colony on espionage charges. The prosecution claimed that the scholar passed state secrets to China. From 1996 to 2000, Schmidt successfully defended the researcher and ecologist Alexander Nikitin, who remains the only person to have won a treason or espionage case against the country’s security services in the history of the U.S.S.R. and modern Russia. Until 1985, Alexander Nikitin served as a naval captain in the Soviet Northern Fleet, where he worked as a chief engineer on nuclear powered submarines. In 1995, Nikitin wrote an analytical report for Bellona on the potential environmental hazards of radioactive waste and decommissioned Russian nuclear submarines, specifically, in northern Russia. The report resulted in him being charged with high treason. TITLE: Twittering Official Resigns From Post AUTHOR: By Irina Titova PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: Konstantin Zheludkov, head of the city’s Petrogradsky district, has become the first government official to leave his position since the new St. Petersburg governor Georgy Poltavchenko took office. Zheludkov, who was known as the city district head most open to interacting with the media, regularly communicating with both journalists and local residents via his Twitter account, left his post unexpectedly on Sept. 1., the same day that Poltavchenko took office. There is no evidence that Poltavchenko had anything to do with Zheludkov’s decision to quit. “It was a tough move for me,” Zheludkov wrote on Twitter in explanation of his resignation. “However, it’s a conscious step. Those who know will understand; those who don’t will condemn…I was putting my heart and soul into everything,” he wrote. The new governor in turn answered a question about Zheludkov’s resignation via his Twitter account, saying “it was not his way to hinder people who believed they had found a more interesting occupation.” On Monday, the news broke that Zheludkov had begun working at the federal construction agency Spetzstroi to supervise construction in Russia’s northwestern federal region, Business New Agency (ABN) reported. Zheludkov, 40, took over as head of the Petrogradsky district just six months ago, on March 1, replacing former head Alexei Delyukin, who was redeployed to the city’s Energy Committee. Delyukin reportedly had to resign because of failures in the district regarding the clearing of snow during the winter. The eminent St. Petersburg doctor Irina Ganelina, mother of the celebrated city historian Lev Lurie, was killed by a snowplow last winter on the Petrograd Side of the city. Zheludkov regularly discussed the district’s problems with residents via Twitter, and went to inspect the attics of old buildings in the area with reporters, earning him popularity among some residents, who also reported that it was easy to get an appointment with him in order to discuss their problems. Zheludkov also made his deputies open Twitter accounts and report on the work they were doing. His brief reign was not entirely scandal-free, however. The Petrovsky municipal district where controversial elections took place on Aug. 21, in which Valentina Matviyeko garnered an unusually high percentage of votes, is also located in his district. Zheludkov became embroiled in another scandal on Aug. 18 when he accused a group of St. Petersburg reporters of vandalism and of setting fire to a monument to Peter the Great located in front of the district’s administration building. Activists of The Other Russia political party had that day held a protest near the bust of Peter the Great during which a flare had been set off. It was unclear what prompted Zheludkov to accuse the reporters present at the event of vandalism via his Twitter account. The unexpected departure of Zheludkov divided many of the district’s residents, some of whom began a campaign on Twitter calling for his return. Zheludkov called on them to halt their campaign, saying he had quit his job of his own accord, Novaya Gazeta reported. TITLE: Dogs Attacked at Military Base AUTHOR: By Galina Stolyarova TEXT: Seven dogs were killed and three wounded in what appears to be one of the most shocking cases of violence against animals in the region in recent years. During the night of Aug. 26, residents of a village in Toksovo, a residential area 20 kilometers to the north of St. Petersburg, heard what they described as alarming sounds resembling gun shots coming from the vicinity of a nearby army base, military detachment no. 42289. A few hours later, the scene that they discovered, together with Andrei Volkov, head of the “Drug” (Friend) charitable foundation devoted to protecting animal rights, and Svetlana Los, head of the “The Right To Live” non-governmental organization, was horrifying. “The empty cages where the dogs were once kept were covered in blood, and some soldiers were busy cleaning up and washing the blood away,” Los said. “There were two wounded dogs lying there. Apparently, one of the dogs had run away. We knew from local residents that there had been 10 dogs at the detachment. The locals would often come and feed the pets.” Nora and Bely, the two dogs that survived the massacre, are now undergoing medical treatment and rehabilitation at a veterinary clinic in St. Petersburg. Bely underwent an operation to remove a bullet from his jaw. “Both dogs have lost a lot of weight; when we found them, one of the poor creatures, Nora, was almost bald: apparently, all her fur had been cut off,” Volkov said. “Bely cannot eat unassisted because of the wound in his jaw.” The killings of the dogs at the army base has sent shockwaves through the local community far beyond animal rights advocates. Human rights advocates have sent a petition to Russia’s Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office asking it to take the investigation of the killings under its control, Volkov said, adding that he had received information about the alleged killing of 16 dogs at a military base in the village of Kirillovskoye in the Leningrad Oblast. “This brutal and senseless crime does not even have an apparent motive: Dogs do not make for dangerous witnesses as they can’t communicate,” reads the petition, signed by Volkov and Los. A preliminary investigation into the incident has so far yielded mixed results. Speaking to reporters on Sept. 1, Andrei Bobrun, the press secretary of the western military district, denied any involvement by the district’s officers or soldiers in the killings. He maintained that the dogs were simply moved to another detachment. A day later, the military investigations department of the Russian Investigative Committee in St. Petersburg concluded that the dog massacre in Toksovo did take place, and on Tuesday, the committee opened a criminal case under the laws governing the treatment of animals. The Investigative Committee is also looking into the allegations of dog killings in Kirillovskoye. Volkov and Los filmed the empty, bloodstained cages and a wounded dog, and submitted the video to Russia’s Chief Military Prosecutor’s Office. TITLE: Queen Margrethe II Makes Official Visit AUTHOR: By Irina Titova PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: Denmark’s Queen Margrethe II and other members of the Danish royal family will visit St. Petersburg and Moscow this week. The queen will make her first official visit to Russia in the company of her French-born husband Prince Henrik and their eldest son Crown Prince Frederik, City Hall’s press service said. After spending two days in Moscow, the royals will come to St. Petersburg to take part in a number of official events, including an official dinner given by the city governor, as well as their own reception. They will also attend the signing of several contracts between the Danish shipping company Maersk and a number of Russian companies. The signing of the documents will take place on board the royal yacht Dannebrog, which arrived in the city on Tuesday. The yacht will serve as the queen’s royal residence during her stay in the city. Queen Margrethe is also set to visit the Baltika brewery, a center for cancer patients and the Peter and Paul Cathedral, where the Danish Princess Dagmar, known in Russia as Empress Maria Fyodorovna, was reburied several years ago. Empress Maria Fyodorovna was the wife of Russia’s Tsar Alexander III and the mother of the last Russian tsar, Nicholas II. She left Russia after the Bolshevik Revolution and was buried in Denmark after her death. In 2005, the Russian and Danish governments agreed to bring her remains back to St. Petersburg to rebury her next to her husband, with whom she had wished to be buried. Queen Margrethe will dedicate a large part of her program in St. Petersburg to visiting places connected with her ancestor. The Danish royals’ visit follows President Dmitry Medvedev’s state visit to Denmark in 2010, which eased relations between the countries that had soured in 2002 when then-president Vladimir Putin canceled a state visit after Danish courts ruled against extraditing Chechen envoy Akhmed Zakayev. The royal family will leave the city on Sept. 10. TITLE: City Marks 70th Anniversary Of Start of Siege of Leningrad PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: St. Petersburg will mark the 70th anniversary of the beginning of the Siege of Leningrad on Thursday with a range of events. From 11.35 a.m. through 11.45 a.m., a system of public loudspeakers all around St. Petersburg will be switched on to broadcast a message dedicated to the fateful day the siege began, from the sounds of the Leningrad metronome that was broadcast during the siege to the sound of the air-raid warnings. Local radio and TV stations will also broadcast these sounds. In keeping with tradition, the city authorities and residents will lay flowers at the monument in the Piskaryovskoye cemetery where most of the siege victims are buried, on the memorial board on Nevsky Prospekt with a sign reading “This side of the street is more dangerous during shelling,” and at other monuments dedicated to victims of World War II. Concerts will also be held around the city. The Siege of Leningrad lasted for 872 days from Sept. 8, 1941 to Jan. 27, 1944. During the siege, about a million city residents died from starvation and from German bombing. TITLE: Activists Await Trial Following Protest AUTHOR: By Sergey Chernov PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: Many of the more than 60 activists detained in St. Petersburg last week are awaiting trial charged with participating in an unauthorized rally and failure to follow a policeman’s orders in the aftermath of the Aug. 31 pro-constitution sit-in demo, while three activists were released on Saturday and Sunday after serving brief terms in custody. Many more were released after spending a night in police precincts last week. A psychology lecturer at St. Petersburg State University, Vladimir Volokhonsky, was detained by the riot police 40 seconds after he sat down on the ground and opened a copy of the constitution near Gostiny Dvor, the regular site for the Strategy 31 rallies held in St. Petersburg since Jan. 31, 2010. He claims he was then held for 48 hours at a police precinct, deprived of food and sleep. The campaign was originally launched in Moscow and demands that the authorities respect Article 31 of the Russian constitution that guarantees the right of assembly. No Strategy 31 rally in St. Petersburg has been authorized by City Hall. Volokhonsky’s case was heard by Judge Alexei Kuznetsov, who frequently hears cases of detained activists in court and whom many oppositionists claim is known for accepting false statements from police officers and handing down harsh punishments. Speaking on Tuesday, Volokhonsky said that the policemen testified that he was shouting “Down with Putin,” despite the fact that he was silent during the protest. “In the Sept. 2 hearing, the policeman said that I was shouting slogans, that I was walking around the area and that I was one of the most active agitators,” he said. According to Volokhonsky, all the police reports were identical, because they copied the same prepared report. Sergei Grebnev, an activist with The Other Russia party who was wearing a bear costume (the bear is the symbol of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin’s party United Russia) and was trampling a model of the historic center of St. Petersburg, was shouting “Heil Putin” when he was detained, but he was also accused of shouting “Down with Putin,” Volokhonsky pointed out. “I wanted to conduct a little experiment to check whether or not people who come to the site and sit down there really are seized and put behind bars without any formalities being observed, without the police issuing any orders or identifying themselves,” he said. “I sat down and was immediately seized by several policemen, who carried me into the bus without saying a word, elbowing me in the face on their way.” Volokhonsky, whose case will be heard again by Kuznetsov on Sept. 20, said he was preparing complaints against the unlawfully poor conditions in police precincts. He added that according to a European law that Russia has agreed to adhere to, the deprival of food and sleep is regarded as torture. Three Other Russia activists were sentenced to brief prison terms for taking part in the rally. Roman Khrenov and Sergei Chepiga were both sentenced to four days, while Nikolai Kuznetsov was sentenced to three days in custody. In a news release, The Other Russia suggested that Judge Kuznetsov might have been taking revenge for private photos taken by activists from his account on Vkontakte (the Russian equivalent of Facebook) and reposted widely on the web in April. The photos showed the relaxing Kuznetsov posing either bare-chested with a large dragon tattoo on his right arm or wearing T-shirts. One T-shirt said (in English) “F**k the Revolution,” while the other read “Imprisoned for article 203” (exceeding authority by a private security firm employee or by a private detective). On some photos, Kuznetsov was holding a beer bottle or sitting behind a table with a glass of beer or bottle of vodka with his arm around women. According to Chepiga, who was sentenced by Kuznetsov to four days in custody, Kuznetsov asked him to delete the photos from the Internet. “He even asked me twice, as I was brought to him [for the hearings] twice,” Chepiga said Tuesday. “He said I would probably get some possible bonuses in the future. He said that it was a request from a fellow human being, between him and me.” TITLE: IN BRIEF TEXT: German Found Dead ST. PETERSBURG (SPT) — A German citizen was found dead near the Rostral Columns in St. Petersburg on Monday night. The 53-year-old man had arrived in the city from Germany on a tourist visa on Sept. 1. The man’s body did not show any signs of violence. It was taken to a morgue for the cause of death to be identified, Interfax reported. Palace Tunnel Mooted ST. PETERSBURG (SPT) — Local authorities have no projects underway regarding the construction of a tunnel underneath the city’s Palace Bridge, RIA Novosti cited the city’s Transport Infrastructure Committee as saying Tuesday, despite earlier reports. On Monday, Alexei Chichkanov, head of the city’s Investment and Strategic Projects Committee, told reporters that the tunnel-building equipment made by Herrenknecht for the construction of the Orlov Tunnel underneath the River Neva may be used to create other similar projects in the city. One such “possible variant could be the construction of a tunnel under Palace Bridge,” Chichkanov said. Chichkanov said that such a project would make it possible to “ease the load of the most beautiful bridge in St. Petersburg and maybe even make it possible to create a pedestrian zone connecting Palace Square and Vasilyevsky Island.” TITLE: Tula’s Ex-Governor Charged With Graft AUTHOR: By Natalya Krainova PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — Troubles were piling up for former Tula Governor Vyacheslav Dudka on Monday as he was charged with accepting a bribe and placed under house arrest. Cases against officials of his caliber, acting or former, are rare. An analyst said Dudka was a scapegoat in an anti-corruption campaign, and that any of Russia’s other 82 regional leaders could have ended up under arrest. Dudka was summoned Monday to the Investigative Committee’s Moscow office, where he was formally charged with accepting a bribe of 40 million rubles ($1.3 million), Interfax said. The charge carries a maximum punishment of 12 years in prison. Investigators decided not to place Dudka in custody, citing his good record in state service and the fact that he has cooperated with them. His lawyers said they would appeal the house arrest. Dudka denied all charges. Dudka is accused of taking the money from the Grinn hypermarket chain, which sought to obtain land in Tula for an outlet. A former subordinate and the chain’s chief executive are also under investigation in the case. As governor, Dudka was first questioned by the Federal Security Service in March, shortly after his subordinate, Viktor Volkov, who is charged with accepting the money, told investigators that he was only a middleman who was supposed to hand the money to Dudka. At the time, Dudka’s press office said in a statement that the accusations were actually a counterattack from local officials whom the governor had targeted in his own anti-corruption campaign. But the case proceeded, and Dudka resigned in July. He never publicly specified the reason for stepping down. Last month, the ruling United Russia party expelled Dudka after he demanded severance pay. A golden parachute is authorized by regional legislation, but party bosses ruled that his request to collect the money “discredited” United Russia, which is struggling to combat its image as the “party of bureaucracy” ahead of State Duma elections in December. Alexei Titkov, an analyst with the Institute for Regional Politics, said Dudka might have fallen victim to a government effort to show it is fighting corruption ahead of the Duma vote and the presidential election in March. “They need to show that fighting graft means a lot for the authorities, and the crackdown on Dudka comes in handy here,” Titkov said by telephone. “Any governor could have been targeted. Dudka was just the unlucky one,” Titkov added. Mikhail Vinogradov, an analyst with the St. Petersburg Politics Foundation, said the charge against Dudka might also be an attempt by law enforcement agencies to show their clout to governors. A convoluted political crisis has been simmering in Tula since last year. In March, the Tula city legislature, controlled by United Russia, sacked Mayor Alisa Tolkachyova, a move endorsed by Dudka. Dudka, 51, in power since 2005 and reappointed by the Kremlin in 2010, has been accused by the local edition of Moskovsky Komsomolets of nepotism and failure to curb rising unemployment in the region. Governors are rarely linked to corruption investigations, but cases are not unheard of. Oryol Governor Yegor Stroyev was questioned by investigators in 2009, and Volgograd Governor Nikolai Maksyuta and Arkhangelsk Governor Nikolai Kiselyov felt compelled to comment on separate corruption cases in 2007. None were charged. The federal government was more strict in the mid-2000s, when then-President Vladimir Putin was building his “power vertical.” Tver Governor Vladimir Platov was jailed in 2005 for abuse of office, and Yaroslavl Governor Anatoly Lisitsyn and Saratov Governor Dmitry Ayatskov faced separate criminal charges in 2004, although those cases were later dropped. TITLE: Suspect ‘Names’ Mastermind in Politkovskaya Deal PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — A key witness-turned-suspect in the 2006 killing of Novaya Gazeta reporter Anna Politkovskaya has struck a plea bargain with investigators and identified the murder’s mastermind, Kommersant reported Saturday, citing unidentified sources. The sources did not name the mastermind but said he is living abroad. As part of the plea bargain, Dmitry Pavlyuchenkov, who was detained in connection with the killing last week, has admitted involvement but said he was only a middleman, not the organizer of the crime, the newspaper said. Pavlyuchenkov, who worked as a senior police investigator at the time of the killing, said he ordered his subordinates to map Politkovskaya’s daily routines. He also admitted to having procured the weapon with which she was shot. He named Chechen businessman Lom-Ali Gaitukayev as an organizer but not mastermind of the shooting. TITLE: Libyan Rebel Forces Detain Ukrainians PUBLISHER: The Associated Press TEXT: TRIPOLI, Libya — Armed rebels detained 19 Ukrainian cooks and oil workers for several days on unsupported claims that they were really snipers for Moammar Gadhafi. They are among thousands of foreigners caught in a web of suspicion as rebel fighters pursue the remnants of Gadhafi’s forces. Gadhafi hired some foreigners as mercenaries, but many others held ordinary jobs in Libya, and the rebels who ousted the Gadhafi regime from most of Tripoli last month often seem to make little effort to tell them apart. “How can we be snipers?” cook Maxim Shadrov asked angrily at a training center for oil workers in Tripoli where he, his wife and 17 other Ukrainians were being held. “They are old. She is a woman. We are not snipers,” he said, pointing to some members of his group. Even a rebel commander conceded that he had no evidence to the contrary, but held them nonetheless, despite a diplomat’s efforts to free them. There have been widespread arrests and frequent abuse of migrant workers since the rebels seized Tripoli late last month, Human Rights Watch said Sunday, but did not give an estimate of the number of detainees. The group said the clampdown created “a grave sense of fear among the city’s African population.” A rebel official estimated that some 5,000 people have been detained since rebels seized Tripoli. At one makeshift detention camp, conditions for Libyan detainees were acceptable, but sub-Saharan Africans were held in overcrowded cells with a putrid stench, Human Rights Watch said. The detainees complained of a lack of water and poor sanitation. The detentions have created an image problem for the rebel leadership, which relies heavily on Western support and has pledged to build a new Libya based on the rule of law, in contrast to Gadhafi’s brutal regime. Some workers said they had not been harassed by either side in the war. Others, including some of the Ukrainian detainees, planned to stay in Libya despite receiving rough treatment. “As you know, life in Ukraine is bad,” said Shadrov, the cook. “We came here to earn money for our family.” The Ukrainians, hired by the Russian-Libyan oil company Dakara, arrived in Tripoli in July. After the rebels entered the capital on Aug. 21, the Ukrainians were detained by rebel fighters, handcuffed and moved to various locations, Shadrov said. “They took everything from us,” he said. “Money, passports, computers, everything.” Othman bin Othman, the rebel commander in charge of the oil workers’ training center, initially said the Ukrainians were armed and trained as snipers, but changed his account after reporters interviewed the detainees. “To be very honest, we didn’t find any weapons in their houses or on them, but they arrived into the country illegally and during a very sensitive time — after the war,” he said. “This led us to believe they were working for the enemy.” Diplomats from Russia and Ukraine visited the group, and Shadrov’s father, a Russian citizen, was able to leave. At a meeting with the rebels, the Ukrainian consul was asked to bring back a written promise that if the Ukrainians were allowed to leave the detention center, they would stay in their homes and not leave the country without proper documentation. TITLE: Student Pilots Will Fly Less, Graduate With Licenses Faster AUTHOR: By Natalya Krainova PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — A new school year always brings change, but flight schools are observing a landmark moment: Student pilots will fly less and graduate faster under a new state-backed program. The shortened — and cheaper — flight lessons should help curb a deficit of pilots amid an explosion in air traffic, state aviation officials said in interviews. But independent aviation experts fear that the new program might churn out poorly trained pilots and increase flight safety risks. The new international training program, named the Multi-Crew Pilot License, is being taught from Thursday at the two Russian flight schools offering higher education for pilots, in St. Petersburg and Ulyanovsk, said Alexander Timokhin, a senior official with the Federal Air Transportation Agency. The program, which is an alternative to the current training course for the Commercial Pilot License, slashes college time for pilots from five years to four, Timokhin said in a telephone interview. It also increases the number of training hours in flight simulators at the expense of actual flight time, although the combined training time in flight simulators and planes will be longer than in the previous program, he said. “The cost declines and the quality grows because of more flight hours,” Timokhin said. But Magomed Tolboyev, a veteran test pilot and honorary president of MAKS, Russia’s top air show, darkly joked about the change, saying, “Then they should also reseat passengers from planes to flight simulators.” “This is blatant money laundering at the expense of passenger safety,” Tolboyev said by telephone. Flight schools, largely state-run, produced a surplus of pilots back in the 1990s, but the amount of air traffic at the time was much lower than over the past decade, which ended with the growing aviation industry suffering from a shortage of trained staff, Transportation Ministry spokesman Timur Khikmatov said. The new training course will limit pilots’ skills by preparing them to only fly one certain type of plane — big, modern jets, said Miroslav Boichuk, president of the Cockpit Personnel Association of Russia, a trade union. “That’s a disadvantage,” Boichuk said. That, however, also fixes a flaw in the current system in which students train on outdated planes and have to take advanced courses after graduation to land a piloting job with an airline, Timokhin said. Still, the current state training produces better-qualified pilots, said Yury Polepishin, head of a state-run Urals training center for civil aviation pilots. To get the old qualification a holder of the new Multi-Crew Pilot License will have to fly another 1,500 hours and then pass an exam for the old program, Polepishin said. TITLE: Film Star Makes Bid For Kremlin AUTHOR: By Alexey Eremenko PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — The upcoming presidential race took a distinctly eccentric twist Monday, when a movie star and ex-priest who moonlights as a creative director for mobile phone retail chain Yevroset announced his decision to run. “It’s true. I am dead serious,” Ivan Okhlobystin, 45, said at a news conference in Moscow. “I want to give the fatherland a certain philosophical and ideological strategy that it is lacking — that which we lack to become a nation,” he said, Interfax reported. Okhlobystin, a self-proclaimed monarchist, said he would propose to extend the presidential term from six to 14 years. He also said restoring the prestige of the army was a crucial task. He has no such plans for the State Duma, which he called “a pointless institution.” Okhlobystin promised more details at an upcoming six-hour talk show-style meeting, to take place at the 87,000-seat Luzhniki stadium on Saturday. The announcement boosted Okhlobystin to the top five of global Twitter trends for Monday. The Russian Orthodox Church, which suspended Okhlobystin from the priesthood last year because he was starring in movies while serving in the church, did not take kindly to his presidential ambitions. The clergy is banned from running for any office, which includes the presidency, church spokesman Vsevolod Chaplin told RIA-Novosti. He did not comment on the church’s own decision in February that priests may, in fact, run for office if authorized by the holy synod. Opposition leader Eduard Limonov and political analyst Mark Urnov said Okhlobystin had no chance of winning the election, expected to be swept by President Dmitry Medvedev, Prime Minister Vladimir Putin or a third candidate supported by the two. Okhlobystin is the third candidate to announce a bid, after Communist leader Gennady Zyuganov and the Liberal Democratic Party leader Vladimir Zhirinovsky. Right Cause leader Mikhail Prokhorov said he may also run. As an independent, Okhlobystin needs to collect 2 million signatures to support his bid. Okhlobystin, known for his trademark round glasses and flamboyant attire, including leather jackets, has starred in 42 movies and television shows since 1983, including “Down House” (2001), a psychedelic take on Dostoevsky’s “The Idiot,” and Pavel Lungin’s 2009 “Tsar,” a Cannes entry. He also has written screenplays for 21 films and shows. A born-again Christian, Okhlobystin was ordained into the priesthood in Uzbekistan’s capital, Tashkent, in 2001. TITLE: 2 Duma Lawmakers Desert United Russia AUTHOR: By Nikolaus von Twickel and Natalya Krainova PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — In a sign of growing discord in the run-up to parliamentary elections, State Duma Deputy Alexei Lebed left United Russia on Friday and accused the party of crushing dissent among members. “I quit because I understand that every person should live honestly [and] have the right to speak their mind independently from the party’s directives,” Lebed, a former Khakasia governor, told reporters in the republic’s capital, Abakan, RIA-Novosti reported. Lebed, a retired general like his older brother Alexander, a political heavyweight killed in a helicopter crash in 1998, is the second Duma lawmaker to leave the ruling party within a week. Last Tuesday, Igor Isakov, who represents the Krasnoyarsk region, quit United Russia after scoring poorly in recent Duma primaries, a much-touted event fraught with allegations of vote rigging. Speculation swirled Friday that the two lawmakers might run in the Dec. 4 elections on the tickets of other parties, including the rival pro-Kremlin A Just Russia and the Kremlin-linked Right Cause. Isakov did not comment publicly on his decision, but his spokesman told RIA-Novosti that his boss might run with the pro-business Right Cause. A Just Russia founder Sergei Mironov rushed ahead by saying Lebed planned to join his party. “Alexei Lebed is a well-known general, a former governor … and also a paratrooper. We are in talks about including him in A Just Russia,” he told Interfax. However, in an interview with Izvestia published online late Friday, Lebed suggested that he was far from having made up his mind. “I’d easily join the Liberal Democratic Party,” he said about the party headed by nationalist populist politician Vladimir Zhirinovsky. Asked whether he would join A Just Russia, he merely replied that Mironov “has his own nuances,” and that the only party he would never join is the Communist Party. Lebed joined United Russia in 2005 and became a Duma deputy in January 2009, after President Dmitry Medvedev dismissed him as Khakasia governor in December 2008 following 13 years in office. United Russia officials said Friday that they considered the deputy no loss for the party. Lebed “almost never attended” meetings of the regional party leadership and refused to take part in the Duma primaries, which ended last month, said the head of the party’s Khakasia branch, Sergei Mozharov, RIA-Novosti reported. Lebed told Izvestia that he had decided against taking part in the primaries because he considered the intraparty votes to be a sham. “I immediately understood that I would be right at the end of the list. The primaries’ supposed transparency has not been achieved in the republic,” he said. Lingering hostility between the two pro-Kremlin parties burst into the open recently as United Russia functionaries said senior members were deserting A Just Russia after polls showed that the party’s chances to take the Duma’s 7 percent hurdle were slim. “Only those who lost in the primaries or did not take part in them and those who have no chance to make it into the next Duma are leaving United Russia,” said Alexei Chesnyakov, a senior United Russia official, Interfax reported. TITLE: Putin’s Father Blamed For Estonian Strife AUTHOR: By Alexandra Odynova PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — Estonian farmers betrayed the father of Prime Minister Vladimir Putin to the Nazis during World War II — and this is what is fueling tensions between Moscow and Tallinn 60 years on, according to new U.S. cables leaked by WikiLeaks. WikiLeaks released last week the final portion of an archive of U.S. diplomatic cables that it obtained in 2010. The batch numbers 251,287 cables, including about 4,000 pertaining to Russia, but one in particular started making rounds in the Russian blogosphere after being published by Kommersant on Monday. A cable dating back to December 2009 cites the Estonian Foreign Ministry’s undersecretary and ambassador to Afghanistan and Pakistan, Harri Tiido, as saying that “Estonia seeks pragmatic relations with Russia and has managed a number of productive working level meetings over 2008.” But relations remained “difficult at the political level” because of Putin, who alone decides the policy toward Estonia even after trading the presidency for the prime minister’s post in 2008, Tiido said. “Putin has a personal gripe with Estonia,” Tiido is quoted as saying. Putin’s father, also Vladimir, fought in the Red Army during the war and parachuted into Estonia for an unspecified operation. But locals, still disgruntled with the country’s occupation by the Soviet Union in 1940 — a year before the Germans invaded Estonia — handed him over to the Nazi forces, Tiido said. TITLE: Ukraine Tells EU Not To Worry About Gas AUTHOR: By Anatoly Medetsky PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — Ukraine’s Prime Minister Mykola Azarov has sought to allay fears that the increasingly tense discourse on gas trade between Moscow and Kiev will lead to yet another breakdown in supplies across Europe. Ukraine will honor the existing contract to buy what it describes as overly expensive Russian gas until the countries sign a new deal, he said in comments that became widely known Monday. “I want to say firmly and absolutely unequivocally to everyone that no one will ever see any kind of war, including a gas war with our strategic partner, with Russia,” he said in a television interview late Sunday. Tension has been building between Russia and Ukraine over gas supplies, with the presidents of both countries stepping into the fray over the weekend with abrasive statements. Similar frictions led Gazprom to cut off deliveries to Ukraine several times over the past decade, in moves that ultimately caused companies and households further west to suffer shortages. Kiev has been increasingly intent on altering the gas contract in recent weeks. It said Moscow should reduce the price of gas under the contract or face legal action in an international court. In another possible ploy, Ukraine said it wanted to break up its state energy firm, Naftogaz, and therefore the Russian gas contract would have to come under revision. Ukraine’s prosecutors are also questioning the agreement as they press charges against the country’s former Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko, who is now incarcerated while standing trial. President Dmitry Medvedev said Saturday that the Kremlin would not budge, and warned that any breach of contract would spell trouble for Ukraine. “Russia is ready to defend its position on the contract in any court,” the Kremlin said in a statement after Medvedev briefly met his Ukrainian counterpart Viktor Yanukovych on the sidelines of a summit in Dushanbe, Tajikistan. Changes regarding Naftogaz should not interfere with the gas supply deal, the statement said. “Otherwise, it may entail grave consequences for Ukraine’s economy,” it said. The Kremlin also noted that the proposed incentives from Ukraine for Russia to review the deal — which Kiev handed over to the Cabinet — were not sufficiently concrete. The statement did not elaborate on the proposals. Azarov told reporters Monday that his government invited Gazprom to produce gas in Ukraine, offering a license to pump 1 trillion cubic meters of the fuel. Moscow has, in exchange, indicated that Ukraine could count on a lower price, should it accede to the customs union between Russia, Belarus and Kazakhstan. Alternatively, another long-standing offer from Moscow was for Naftogaz to merge with Gazprom. Ukraine brushed these proposals aside again in recent days. As one reason against joining the customs union, Azarov said doing so would require a revision of Ukraine’s agreements as a member of the World Trade Organization. “It’s absolutely unrealistic,” he said last week. In a comment on the possible court action, Ukraine’s Foreign Minister Kostyantyn Gryshchenko said Monday that the government would do “everything possible” to avoid suing Russia. Yanukovych also said Saturday after meeting with Medvedev that legal action was the last resort. Under the gas supply agreement, Gazprom and Naftogaz are to take disputes to the arbitration court of the Stockholm Chamber of Commerce, the same court where the Russian-born billionaire co-owners of oil producer TNK-BP derailed the Arctic deal between their partner BP and Rosneft. TITLE: Agency Sees Related-Party Lending AUTHOR: By Howard Amos PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: MOSCOW — The high level of related-party lending engaged in by Russian and CIS banks is indicative of poor corporate governance and lax underwriting standards — and is a structural weakness of the entire banking sector, according to a report released by Moody’s credit rating agency. Although Russian banks saw a small decline in related-party lending in 2010, the average amount of related-party loans issued by banks across the region was 10 percent of gross loans and 50 percent of shareholders’ equity. The report, released Thursday, said this rate of related-party lending was five times higher than in Central and Eastern Europe and twice as high as in the Middle East. Moody’s cited Bank of Moscow, which required the largest state bailout in modern Russian history after a July announcement of a $14 billion hole in its finances, as an example of the danger of a lender working with customers with whom it has an organizational, political or personal relationship. Bank of Moscow was closely tied to City Hall under the former mayor of Moscow, Yury Luzhkov, and had links with the sprawling business empire of his wife, Yelena Baturina. The Central Bank said at the time of the scandal that almost a third of Bank of Moscow’s loans were “problematic.” Moody’s made a direct correlation between high instances of related-party lending and significant levels of problem loans. Banks that engage heavily in this practice “cannot enforce or obtain extra collateral due to the special nature of their relationship with related borrowers and inherent conflicts of interest,” the report said. In 2010, Russian, Kazakh, Ukrainian and Armenian banks decreased their related-party exposures as a percentage of capital. Exposure increased for Belarussian, Azeri and Uzbek banks. Related-party loans are more prevalent in small and midsized regional banks with assets below $10 billion that tend to have established shareholder-linked client bases and operate in geographically restricted areas of low business diversification. The report also warned that the level of related-party lending was likely to be significantly more than can be identified through official records and publicly available statistics. Though based on 116 banks in Russia and the Commonwealth of Independent States that together represent 70 percent to 80 percent of banking system assets, the report warns that because of regulatory weakness and opaque holding structures, much remains hidden from the eye of the observer. Moody’s did not include related-party exposure through securities (bonds and equities), interbank and off-balance sheet credit commitments in the survey. Russian banks increased their lending to non-financial companies by 2.5 percent in August, bringing the annual increase to 19 percent, said Mikhail Sukhov, head of the Central Bank’s licensing department, Bloomberg reported. Speaking at a banking conference in Sochi, Sukhov said retail lending had grown 28 percent on the same period last year and 3.3 percent in August. TITLE: Gazprom Sprang a 2009 Leak of $1 Billion PUBLISHER: Vedomosti TEXT: The Audit Chamber estimates that Gazprom managed to lose 28 billion rubles (nearly $1 billion) of funds and property — about 4 percent of total funds spent — through its subsidiaries’ implementation of the gas giant’s 2009 capital expenditure program. The company is trying to combat such losses, the auditors say, but anti-corruption crusader Alexei Navalny says the estimate is actually low. In January 2010, President Dmitry Medvedev said he cared about how state companies’ huge resources are spent, and ordered the Audit Chamber to check the efficiency of state companies’ investment programs. The first results of their effort were announced late last week. The biggest spender in the country, Gazprom, in 2009 alone lost more than 28 billion rubles, according to the Audit Chamber report. That is the amount of “unreasonable expenses, financial losses, and missing money and material possessions” that was discovered by a Gazprom internal audit of its subsidiaries. The total investment program for that year was 745.5 billion rubles, indicating that nearly 4 percent was lost. The audit does not reveal the way in which this was lost — only via purchases or also through contracted services — or in which subsidiaries. The report noted that Gazprom did not ignore the situation. “Several employees” were subjected to “material and disciplinary accountability. Some were given reprimands; others lost their bonuses, were demoted, or fired.” Measures were taken to repair the damage caused by the violations and prevent them from occurring in the future. Efforts were made to return assets and seek the “return of overpayments.” TITLE: Yanukovych’s Gamble Could Backfire AUTHOR: By Yevgeny Kiselyov TEXT: The trial of former Ukrainian Prime Minister Yulia Tymoshenko is approaching its final stages in Kiev. Amazingly, just 18 months ago, Tymoshenko was only a few percentage points away from winning the presidential election, and today the leader of Ukraine’s largest opposition party, Fatherland, is sitting behind bars in pretrial detention. According to the prosecution, Tymoshenko unlawfully signed a secret gas import contract with Russia in 2009, when she was prime minister, forcing state-owned Naftogaz to sign the gas deal with Gazprom. Prosecutors claim she agreed to the 10-year contract to buy natural gas from Russia at exceedingly high prices without getting approval from the government. Gas prices could reach an incredible price of $500 per thousand cubic meters by the end of this year — a boon for Gazprom but crippling for Ukraine’s teetering economy. In addition, Tymoshenko is charged with illegally using carbon credit funds that were meant to be used for pensions. Yet many Western commentators have a superficial and naive understanding of the Tymoshenko case. They believe that she is being punished for her political views. I can’t help but smile when I hear these comments. After all, what exactly are her political views? Nobody knows. They are a hodge podge of nationalistic, left-wing, right-wing, liberal and, at times, even Communist rhetoric. A typical example was during the last presidential election campaign when Tymoshenko dodged a question that was particularly controversial for the highly splintered Ukrainian electorate: Does she consider Stepan Bandera, leader of the armed Ukrainian nationalist movement from the 1930s through the 1950s, a hero? Tymoshenko could not answer yes or no because, for some of her supporters in the western part of the country, Bandera is an icon, a person who fought his whole life for an independent Ukraine and who was ultimately killed by a KGB assassin who had infiltrated his organization. Meanwhile, other Ukrainians, particularly in eastern Ukraine, view Bandera as a terrorist who collaborated with the Nazis and was complicit in war crimes. Today, Tymoshenko condemns President Viktor Yanukovych and calls the current government criminal. But many remember very clearly that as recently as summer 2009, Tymoshenko negotiated with Yanukovych to form a political alliance. Had those talks succeeded, it is entirely possible that Tymoshenko could have become prime minister under Yanukovych’s current administration. Or Yanukovych could have become prime minister and Tymoshenko president. Both options were considered and discussed in 2009. Thus, many Ukrainians don’t buy Tymoshenko’s claim that she is an ideological opponent of Yanukovych. But this does not explain why the government seems to be determined to put her behind bars. It might seem that the authorities simply want to silence the leader of the opposition. If convicted of current charges, Tymoshenko could face up to 10 years in prison. Even a suspended sentence would disqualify her from running for parliamentary or presidential elections. Nonetheless, polls show that if Tymoshenko were to run against Yanukovych in another presidential race, he would likely win because voters view Yanukovych as the lesser of two evils. If a more popular and less-tainted candidate were to run against Yanukovych, however, it would be much more difficult for him to win. Thus, if the goal of the current Tymoshenko trial is to eliminate a competitor, then either somebody is feeding Yanukovych bad advice or else he is unwittingly putting himself into a trap. At the same time, however, elections are still a long way off, and Ukraine’s economy is already collapsing under the weight of low growth and high gas prices. Something must be done urgently, but Moscow’s only response has been to propose to Kiev that it join a customs union with Russia; let Russia buy up shares in Ukraine’s gas transportation companies, much like Belarus did; and Russia would receive large discounts on gas in return, just as Belarus did. Ironically, President Dmitry Medvedev made this proposal on Aug. 24, the day Ukraine celebrated 20 years of independence from Russia. It is clear, though, that Ukraine will never enter into a customs union with Russia. That would kill Ukraine’s plans for membership in the World Trade Organization and for signing a free-trade zone agreement with the European Union. It would also eliminate any Ukrainian hopes of ever becoming an EU member state. Meanwhile, tensions between Russia and Ukraine are getting worse. Ukrainian Prime Minister Nikolai Azarov and presidential administration head Sergei Levochkin announced that Kiev might appeal to an international arbitration court to cancel its current gas agreements with Moscow. This offers another explanation as to why Tymoshenko is on trial. If Kiev can prove in an independent court that Tymoshenko violated the law in signing the gas agreement with Russia, it will reinforce Ukraine’s case to revoke the deal. Moscow is clearly nervous about the trial. Senior Russian officials have repeatedly made statements defending Tymoshenko and condemning the case against her. This is hypocritical, of course, considering that former Yukos CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky has been locked up for eight years on politically driven charges. In the end, Yanukovych may have backed himself into a corner. In part, the Tymoshenko case is being used to defeat Russia’s attempts to use one-sided gas contracts, a customs union and other tricks to keep Kiev within the Kremlin’s sphere of influence. But this could very well provoke strong protests from European leaders if, in the event of a ruling against Tymoshenko, they conclude that Yanukovych violated Western democratic values and that the ruling was politically driven. This could ultimately undermine his efforts to integrate more closely with the EU. If so, Yanukovych will receive exactly what he was trying to avoid in the first place. If he is unable to retain the EU as a strategic ally, Ukraine will be forced back into a subservient role with regard to Moscow. Yevgeny Kiselyov is a political analyst and hosts a political talk show on Inter television in Ukraine. TITLE: between the lines: The Prokhorov-Khodorkovsky Tandem AUTHOR: By Alexei Pankin TEXT: Soviet communism was ultimately buried by two of its most prominent native sons — Communist Party General Secretary Mikhail Gorbachev and Moscow Communist Party chief Boris Yeltsin. Now it seems that Russia’s neoliberal capitalism will also fail thanks to two of its greatest beneficiaries — former Yukos CEO Mikhail Khodorkovsky and billionaire Right Cause leader Mikhail Prokhorov. I came to the first conclusion after reading an enormous number of articles published in recent weeks on the August 1991 coup that resulted in the collapse of communism and the Soviet Union. It was Gorbachev who, without any pressure whatsoever from below, took the country along the path of democratic and market reforms, thereby paving the way for Yeltsin’s political career. And it was probably the personal conflict between these two party chiefs that explains why subsequent events were more counterrevolutionary than evolutionary. After Yeltsin won and the counterrevolutionary excitement faded, the popularity of his neoliberal ideology began a steady decline — to the point where liberalism today has become a bad word. The second conclusion occurred to me several months ago after reading an issue of Forbes magazine online that ran a selection of quotations showing Khodorkovsky’s ideological evolution. The list began with his “The Man with a Ruble” essay co-authored in 1992 with his future Yukos colleague Leonid Nevzlin and ended with his prison writings that can best be described in modern terminology as left-wing social democracy. Ekho Moskvy radio recently aired a program titled “The Left-Wing Manifesto of Right Cause,” referring to Prokhorov’s party. Many of the points made in the manifesto seem to come from the Bolsheviks in 1917. Prokhorov’s promise to give out free land to people willing to work it is a repeat of the Bolshevik slogan “Land to the Peasants.” The call for “universal military duty with voluntary enlistment” is essentially a militia system of manning the armed forces that existed in the Soviet Union until the early 1930s. The media seized upon these and many other parallels and emphasized how far removed Prokhorov’s ideology was from the usual neoliberal Gaidar-Chubais line of thinking. But it is not important how dissimilar Prokhorov’s manifesto is to the principles of the young economists who tried to liberalize the Russian economy in the early 1990s. What counts is the extent it answers the needs of the present day. In my opinion, it answers those needs quite well. It does so all the more because the old labels lose their meaning in modern life. The militia principle — that is, universally arming the people — is how the army is built in Switzerland, the most bourgeois country of the world. The promise to give land to the peasants is an update of the U.S. Homestead Act of the 19th century, and Prokhorov’s call for the state and society to focus their efforts on developing this country’s vast, untouched stretches of land is the Russian version of the U.S. drive to settle the Western frontier. It is even more interesting that both Khodorkovsky and Prokhorov achieved remarkable success and wealth in the post-Soviet system. Despite the very different circumstances in which they now live, both have come to the conclusion that the country must move toward a more socialistic future. The two make an interesting tandem. Alexei Pankin is editor of WAN-IFRA-GIPP Magazine for publishing business professionals. TITLE: Autumn consolation AUTHOR: By Sergey Chernov PUBLISHER: The St. Petersburg Times TEXT: Things do not generally start happening on the local music club scene after the sleepy summer until Fish Fabrique celebrates its birthday, which falls on Sept. 2. This year, Fish Fabrique’s management said it chose to celebrate the occasion in a modest way, reserving a large-scale celebration for its coming of age next year, when it turns 18. Until last year, the annual parties celebrated the birthday of both the club and of the group Tequilajazzz, which played its first concert at TaMtAm in September 1993, but the band split last year. Performing instead was Jenia Lubich, the up-and-coming local indie-pop singer who spent a stint as a vocalist with the French band Nouvelle Vague, known for transforming rock and punk hits into bossa nova and pop songs sung by silken female voices. Despite the absence of frontman Yevgeny Fyodorov, the spirit of Tequilajazzz was still somehow present. The band’s 1990s clubbing anthem “Nalivaya” — featuring the line “First Griboyedov, then Fish Fabrique,” describing the route of a local clubgoer — was played after Jenia Lubich finished her set, while the band’s ex-drummer Alexander “Duser” Voronov was DJing at the club’s older, smaller bar after midnight. Pavel Zaporozhtsev, who co-founded Fish Fabrique with Oleg “Fish” Labetsky (the club was named after the latter’s nickname and the Berlin club Fabrique), recalled how together with the founder of the rockabilly club Money Honey, he used to visit construction sites around the city to buy materials from the construction managers, because in 1994 nothing was sold in the stores. When, with American friends, the club threw the city’s first Halloween party on Oct. 31, 1994, the public had little idea of what it was about. The party flyers given away beforehand carried a warning that nobody would be allowed to enter without a costume, and the organizers were shocked when visitors wearing suits and ties started to arrive (the Russian word kostyum is used to mean both costume and suit). The suit-clad pundits were sent to a nearby store to buy something crazy to wear. Hinting at the changed times, the T-shirts printed by the club for its 17th birthday featured a double-headed fish: A tongue-in-cheek reference to both the Russian coat of arms and the present-day political rule of the duumvirate. Griboyedov, which will celebrate its 15th anniversary on Oct. 18, is another classic St. Petersburg club and is still going strong. Housed in a Cold War-era bunker, it expanded in 2006 when a glass extension built above ground opened known as Griboyedov Hill, where concerts are also held. Griboyedov’s birthday parties feature performances by many of the best local bands. Zoccolo, the direct successor of the legendary club Moloko, which was closed in October 2005, is another seminal local club located within walking distance of Fish Fabrique. Chinese Pilot Jao Da, a local branch of the eminent Moscow club of the same name, boasts an increasingly interesting music program, having hosted a concert by avant-rock Finnish singer and musician Ville Leinonen last week and expecting ex-Henry Cow musician Tim Hodgkinson to perform on Sept. 25. “A great club for small indie concerts like this,” Leinonen commented after the show. Moving the bar from the concert room to the room closer to the entrance was a great idea. If the club removes the tables from near the stage, it would no doubt be welcomed by the public, as it would allow more people to enjoy gigs. Dusche, the most recent addition to the local music club scene, has drawn the public to a previously closed warehouse area on Ligovsky Prospekt. Launched by members of the local bands Leningrad and Spitfire in December, Dusche’s forte is that it is one of few local clubs that are actually owned by musicians, meaning it understands the needs of both the bands and the public. Mod, in its second and bigger location just off Nevsky Prospekt on the embankment of the Griboyedov Canal, is another must for alternative clubgoers. Sadly, Mod’s rooftop summer terrace — a great place for concerts or low-key relaxation — is officially closing for the cold season on Saturday, Sept. 10, though owner Denis Cherevichny said it might reopen occasionally on warm evenings. Mod will celebrate its fifth birthday on Sept. 23 with a garage-rock concert by bands Yellow Pillow and Garage Monsters and a DJ party. The large venues intended exclusively for larger concerts with capacities of between 1,000 and 1,200 that opened in the city during the past few years were closed or barely functioned during the summer. Now, having reopened after the holidays, they promise some electrifying acts in the next few months. Kosmonavt, which underwent renovation work during the summer, Glavclub and Zal Ozhidaniya will all have something to offer. Check the Gigs section of The St. Petersburg Times every week or the venues’ web sites for names and dates. DJ bars Datscha, Fidel and Stirka continue to draw the crowds, while the summer “beach” bar Dunes will go on operating at its second location on Ligovsky Prospekt until the weather turns cold. At least one music club did not survive the summer. Closed, officially for repairs, since the second week of June, the club Shum — originally launched in Sept. 2010 — failed to reopen in September. “The building’s owner has already dismantled the stage and the walls, and wants to let the premises as office space,” Shum’s former art director Leonid Novikov said. “This is Russian showbiz; it’s all like that.”