The St. Petersburg Times  

Issue #1530 (92), Friday, November 27, 2009

BUSINESS

Ïåðåâåñòè íà ðóññêèé Ïåðåâåñòè íà ðóññêèé Print this article Print this article

Gazprom Increases Investment Plan for 2010

The St. Petersburg Times

MOSCOW — Gazprom modestly increased its investment spending for next year to $27.9 billion Tuesday, even as it risks losing half as much this year and next year in a dispute over extra customs duties.

The spending is 5.4 percent more than the world’s largest gas producer is investing this year, further evidence of its hopes for a market recovery. But the optimistic spending plans may run into trouble if the Federal Customs Service wins in an ongoing, multibillion-dollar dispute, although Gazprom is cautious about describing the threat.

“We believe it would be more accurate to speak about the emergence of a risk for Gazprom’s earnings to fall seriously, which could influence the company’s financial position,” a company spokeswoman said.

This made the outlook for the company seem disturbing, despite assurances by board chairman and First Deputy Prime Minister Viktor Zubkov. He said in a Gazprom statement that the company would “undoubtedly” meet its investment targets in 2010. The statement announced the approval of the spending by the board.

Gazprom complained earlier this month — in the financial report for the third quarter — that the customs service changed the rules that it applies to gas exports, effective from April. It began asking Gazprom to state the exact volume and price of its outbound shipments before they cross the border. Gazprom said it was technically unfeasible and declined to alter its practice, which was to file the statements after signing off-take papers with the customers abroad.

As a result, customs officials began charging higher duties based on Gazprom’s preliminary export statements, which carry export estimates normally exceeding the actual volume and price. The Federal Customs Service, which has the task of filling the federal budget, refused to accept the more accurate final export statements that the company supplied later.

“Such actions by the customs service divert considerable financial resources from Gazprom’s business,” the company said in the report.

The Federal Customs Service also demanded earlier this year that Gazprom pay the export duty in advance for every month. Previously, the company paid the duty after delivery.

Gazprom may lose a total of 386.1 billion rubles ($13.4 billion) this year and next year because of these changes, Vedomosti reported Tuesday. Most of the losses would come from Gazprom’s inability to recover value-added tax of more than 200 billion rubles next year on the gas exported this year, after the customs service rejected its final export statements, the report said.

The rest would include the difference between the higher duties from the customs service and what Gazprom would normally pay according to its final export statements. As another portion of the losses, Gazprom would also pay penalties because it continued to pay the duties it considered fair.

The Gazprom spokeswoman declined comment on the amount and nature of potential losses.

Federal Customs Service spokesman Dmitry Kotikov referred questions about the matter to Central Energy Customs, the branch that deals with energy trade. Central Energy Customs spokeswoman Yulia Ivashkovskaya asked for the questions to be e-mailed; they went unanswered Tuesday.

More stories by this section:

Watchdog, Oil Firms Reach Deal | Prosecutors Veto Plan For Customs Checks | Ulyukayev Says Central Bank Will Carry On Making Cuts to Rates | Expats Struggle to Maintain Lifestyle, But Friends Help | Putin Promises to Build Homes for Officers

Something to say? Write to the Opinion Page Editor. Click to open the form.

E-mail or online form:

If you are willing for your comment to be published as a letter to the editor, please supply your first name, last name and the city and country where you live.

Your email:

Little about you:

SUBMIT OPINION


Or take part in the discussion below.


© Copyright The St. Petersburg Times 1993 - 2010