Tuesday, July 29, 2014
 
Follow sptimesonline on Facebook Follow sptimesonline on Twitter Follow sptimesonline on RSS
MOST READ



PARTNER NEWS



BLOGS



OPINION



WHERE TO GO?

The Romanovs in St. Petersburg

History of St. Petersburg Museum

Small Tragedy, Fatal Passion

Rimsky-Korsakov Apartment Museum

 

  Print this article Print this article

Going From Georgian Wine to U.S. Adoptions

Published: January 16, 2013 (Issue # 1742)




  • Photo:

TheKremlin is conducting its current anti-U.S. campaign according tothe same scenario it used inall previous campaigns against countries that irritated President Vladimir Putin andwere labeled as enemies. Similar campaigns were waged against Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania andPoland.

TheKremlins approach tothese propaganda campaigns follows thesame basic standard. First, every campaign is reactive innature andnever theresult ofa deliberate strategy. Instead, thecampaigns are spontaneous andoften reckless, knee-jerk reactions tospecific events theKremlin finds annoying. Forexample, thelarge-scale campaign against Georgia inthe fall of2006 was launched after Tbilisi detained five officers ofRussias Main Intelligence Directorate oncharges ofespionage. Similarly, acampaign was unleashed against Estonia in2007 after that country moved amonument tofallen Soviet soldiers out ofthe Tallinn city center. TheKremlin initiated thecurrent anti-U.S. campaign as aspontaneous retaliation forpassage ofthe Magnitsky Act.

Second, thedecision toinitiate adefamation campaign against adesignated country is almost always made byPutin andusually confirmed ina special meeting with members ofthe Security Council. As arule, thecampaigns are emotional reactions without any somber or thorough analysis ofits predictable consequences. Forexample, aspecial session ofthe Security Council was called immediately after theRussian intelligence officers were detained inGeorgia, andthe series ofmeasures totake inresponse was hurriedly worked out during that meeting.

Third, themeasures used are always selected so as tocause maximum damage or discomfort forthe enemy andwithout any regard formoral or legal considerations. Forexample, theanti-Georgia campaign in2006 incorporated ano-holds-barred strategy. Air andautomobile traffic between thecountries was halted, as were mail andmoney transfers. House-to-house searches were conducted forpeople with Georgian surnames under thepretext ofthe struggle against illegal immigration. Detainees were subjected toabuse, andmore than 800 people were quickly deported, two ofwhom died. Anumber ofGeorgian children even those with Russian citizenship were evicted fromschools. Georgian restaurants andcafes were subjected topunitive inspections, some ofwhich were forced toshut down.

Thesame fate befell major Georgian-owned casinos andentertainment complexes such as Kristall, Golden Palace andBakkara, while casinos owned byother nationalities were left untouched. Publishers putting out books byrenowned Georgian author Grigory Chkhartishvili, better known as Boris Akunin, were subjected totax inspections. TheKremlin enlisted chief sanitary doctor Gennady Onishchenko, who has served thesame function insimilar campaigns, toban Georgian food products andwine. Most ofthose sanctions against Georgia remain inforce tothis day, andeven more were added following theRussia-Georgia war in2008.

Pages: [1] [2]






 


ALL ABOUT TOWN

Tuesday, July 29


A video of a Queen concert from 1986 will be shown today at 8 p.m. in Yaschik, 50/13 Ligovsky Prospekt.



Times Talk